Here is a real journey through both platforms — from a pasted decision to a verdict, a memo, a post, and a watchlist that keeps running after you commit. No step invents anything the analysis didn't support.
Describe the call in plain language. A real example:
“Should I take the CHF 250k angel round at a 2M cap, or bootstrap another six months?”
Running an analysis needs a free account — magic-link sign-in, no card.
Start at /analyze →15 dimensions, each scored against evidence with its confidence tier shown honestly. The report returns a verdict — not a cheer — plus a Red Team pass that argues against your thesis on purpose, because an investor or reality will do it anyway. When the evidence is thin, the report says so instead of inventing confidence.
About SEUS →The completed analysis becomes an investor-ready brief — the argument for taking the round, with every assumption named and every unsupported number flagged as an assumption, not dressed up as a fact. Nothing is invented to fill a slide; the gaps stay visible because your counterparty will find them in the first meeting anyway.
About AVORYN →A LinkedIn post, an X thread, and an investor email — drafted from the same locked analysis, so what you publish says the same thing as what you scored. VYRALIS works from evidence the analysis established; it doesn't inflate the claim to earn a click.
About VYRALIS →Save the decision's context as a Space. After you commit, PENOCH keeps watching the system the decision lives inside — signals, phase shifts, and AUGUR conditional scenarios that state what follows if the signals you've confirmed persist, strengthen, or reverse. When the ground moves, score the follow-up decision with SEUS RT.
About PENOCH →